A campaign as square as the chocolate its advertising.

2. März 2007

Ritter must make great chocolate. I know this not only from my own experience of having eaten more squares than I’d like to admit - but because people are buying it in large quantities even though they’ve seen the advertising.

Every week recently there’s been a new fake testimonial with a weak attempt at humour. And whether its the “Kau-boy”(!) holding up the peanut version or the surprised woman thinking of milking the Alpenmilch variant there are constant elements in all of the ads - they’re colour coordinated, poorly photographed and completely insight free.

Its not as if the product doesn’t offer many opportunities to leverage insights either. There’s not a product around which encounters more psychological territory than chocolate, whether its the inner conflict faced when deciding whether to open another packet or the instant feeling of euphoria once one has succumbed to doing so. Chocolate is highly emotional, elicits fierce brand loyalty and is just begging for an insight-driven approach.

Ritter once managed to develop the classic claim which they’re still using - “Quadratisch. Praktisch. Gut.” It might not be insight-based but it is unique and its highly memorable. Since then, the brand hasn’t really been able to add anything to their advertising history which matches the quality of the chocolate.

P.S. The idea of milking a bar of milk chocolate isn’t exactly new either. The Masterfoods brand, Galaxy, used the idea as a claim for many years but with far more charm - “so full of milk, it almost moos.”

Is fragrance really so insight-free?

21. Dezember 2006

As the Christmas advertising frenzy draws to a close, it looks like it will all have been worth it for most companies. Sales are up and luxury items, in particular, are apparently having a good year. Expensive fragrances are no exception.

There has certainly been a large amount of advertising for perfumes this year, as there usually is in the run up to Christmas. At a guess, more than 50 brands have been advertised, most costing at least 20 Euros and some up to 100 Euros or more - that’s a lot of money for a product where the packaging often costs more to produce than the actual contents.

So how do the manufacturers choose to sell their highly-priced fragrances? Well, it certainly isn’t by using a single insight! Beautiful people, luxury imagery and a packshot - that covers almost all of the communication I’ve seen this year. There’s rarely even a line of copy to accompany the visuals, never mind an insight.

I don’t doubt that perfume manufacturers have learned that what they have been doing for years can be a successful way to sell their fragrances - but can it be the only way? Is it indeed the best way? In a market with more than 50 advertised rivals, wouldn’t it be wise for just some of them to try something different - use an insight perhaps?

Maybe next year, a courageous perfume company will try to sell their brand not just with attractive imagery but by showing understanding for the role that perfume plays in consumers’ lives. I really hope so. Because if they do and the brand is successful, then in 2008 all perfume companies will be looking for insights.

Are BBDO Consulting using the best “Controller gesucht” ad of the year? Yep!

24. November 2006

One of the most difficult and underrated jobs in any advertising agency is that of the controller and at a Network organisation it’s even harder. Keeping the SOX-obsessed Headquarters happy while simultaneously managing not to alienate the only-half-organised staff is a fine line to have to tread.

So, finding the right person to fill the Controller’s job at an agency is never easy. Obviously, you need a controller who is good at the job itself but at the same time you need someone with empathy, patience and a sense of humour - rare qualities in the profession.

Congratulations then to BBDO Consulting who have a whole page ad in the current W&V which will appeal to just the kind of controller they need. The ad is simply a Sudoku puzzle, (the Japanese word for time killer,) where you have to solve the puzzle to find out the number to call. Simple - but just right for the mentality of the candidates they are looking for.

The only nitpick one could have with the idea is that, contrary to popular belief, to solve a Suduko requires no number skills whatsoever: Sudoko is a logic puzzle where letters, colours or pictures of nine different types of fruit work just as well. Understanding numbers helps to solve a Sudoku about as much as it does to win at Lotto.

Nevertheless - it’s a nice, insightful ad.

Those multi-talented advisors at the HypoVereinsbank.

27. Oktober 2006

For an Insight-driven thinker, the current HypoVereinsbank campaign is like a red rag to a male cow. – except I won’t be charging the bank with my business in the near future.

Each ad in the series of one-pagers highlights a personality trait of an individual advisor working at the HVB. This week’s financial hero is apparently particularly “kreativ” –creativity being an apparently unexpected but welcome attribute for a banker. (Actually, if his advice is as amateurish as his artistic skills, his clients had better beware.)

I wonder what the next desirable trait will be: Honesty? The ability to call you back within a week? Far more interesting is the question about how this campaign came to be approved in the first place.

Few campaigns for financial services take the consumers’ point of view into account, which is, of course, a big mistake. These HVB ads go out of their way to do just the opposite! Do they really believe that consumers are even vaguely interested in the HVB team’s special skills even if they believe them? Somehow, I doubt it.

What consumers would probably find far interesting is if their real concerns were addressed. How about addressing questions such as: “Is there an investment plan to match my fluctuating disposable income?” Or even “does the bank act in its own interest or in mine?”

 I’m pretty sure that the team that produced this campaign are pleased with their efforts: it looks good, feels different and it’s far less conservative than most in the category. Yet I have to believe that these worthwhile goals could also have been achieved with a campaign that at least acknowledges the existence of consumers – you know, the same people who are actually expected to visit the bank.    

 

Caro – a perfect product for Insights.. with little Insight to be seen.

5. Oktober 2006

Some products lend themselves to leveraging Insights in their communication more than others. When Insights are behind a product’s basic reason for existing, however, you’d think any communication developed would rely strongly on them. Well Caro is such a product – yet if there’s an Insight in their current press ad, it’s well hidden.

Caro, the Kaffeesurrogatextrakt (sounds delicious) in their current advertising show a dreamy woman standing in a cornfield with the line “so schmeckt Wohlfühlen” and branding. That’s it. Now, of course, consumers do have a need to feel comfortable but quite frankly the line could fit to any number of food products: tea, cake, alcohol.

Caro would no doubt claim that the idea plays to the Insight that coffee can make some people feel tense – yet surely there’s a stronger Insight to be leveraged here?

Caro, as a product, is presumably bought by women (mostly) who either avoid artificial stimulation, are averse to coffee or its effects or simply want to give their kids a healthy warm drink. All three of these uses would seem to lead to more promising Insight areas than “Wohlfühlen” which pops up everywhere nowadays, from bath care products to airplane seats.

There are good arguments for drinking Caro – it’s a shame that they’re not to be found in their communication.   

 

Sparkasse Insurance (Versicherung) TV Spot is funny – but is it right?

22. September 2006

Home-grown TV spots that are genuinely funny are rare in Germany, so when one does come along, we really should be grateful. No pontificating about whether humour should be used to sell serious products – of course it should, if it’s relevant. 

Yet while the new Sparkasse Insurance TV spot, (which can be seen at www.kress.de ) made me laugh, I can’t help wondering if it’s doing the job it’s supposed to be doing.

In the spot, an amiable loser is used to show just how fast things can go wrong in life. Within half a minute he’s lost his job, his girlfriend and his flat and he’s left holding the baby – literally. It’s funny – but what’s the consumer take-away? If you lose everything that’s dear to you, at least you know you were insured?

It’s not easy to advertise insurance. The temptation is always to dramatise the negative side because it’s easier to show than a happy life. Yet still a way should be found to get from the negative situation to something positive - otherwise consumers are left with an uncomfortable feeling. This doesn’t mean that a “heile Welt” happy ending should be stuck on the end of the spot – but even a small light at the end of the tunnel would help….

The big Hollywood studios often film alternative endings for their films – depressing, but true – and then test them to see which ending viewers prefer. Invariably, they vote overwhelmingly for a happy end, which is why in the cinema, life usually turns out just fine.

If the Sparkasse had found a way to make life turn out fine for their loser too – even just a little – their funny film would probably be a more effective film too.

A limousine that glides? Well that’s … interesting.

13. September 2006

It’s not that often that a new car is in a position to talk about something in its advertising that other cars can’t. While speed, safety, economy, technical specifications and looks just about cover most of the competition’s communication, there is one model of car with a true USP – the new Citroen C6. 

The C6 is the latest in a long line of large Citroens that have always been a little different from other cars in their class. The hydro-pneumatic suspension which has made the larger Citroens rise to the occasion of being on the road for many years has now apparently been improved significantly. The result is a car that offers the smoothest ride of any (something which tests seem to confirm) while looking far better than any of its predecessors since the classic DS. 

Given such a USP it should be easy to make creative, relevant advertising – so why didn’t they? Instead, in the ads, we see a car in limbo with the headline “Innovations come and go. This one glides.” 

So what’s wrong with that, you might think. At least they say what is different about the car. Well, yes they do say it - but they should have dramatised it. 

Wouldn’t it have been far better to talk about what having the smoothest ride around could mean to consumers? About who could benefit particularly from such a car? (Photographers or film-makers perhaps.) Hey, this car is the smoothest on the road – yet the only indication in the ad is the low-key headline.A car in limbo can’t dramatise anything except looks.

A smooth ride is more important to some drivers than any of the other benefits above – so why doesn’t the C6 make much more of it? Today’s paper says sales of French cars are decreasing. Hmm…

How altruistic is Dove’s campaign to increase children’s self-esteem?

8. September 2006

There aren’t many 6-page spreads in Stern or Spiegel nowadays – or in any other magazine for that matter – so Dove’s seemingly altruistic self-esteem (Selbstwertgefühl) campaign to help children accept the way they look certainly stands out.


It’s all part of Dove’s “Campaign for Real Beauty”, of course, which is a much-quoted example of how to demonstrate understanding of consumers and the way they feel.


 The UK version of this new, self-esteem initiative explains the cause, which they are seeking donations for, as follows:

 
 Every day we are bombarded by hundreds – if not thousands – of airbrushed images of “beauty”… images with the power to affect how we see our bodies and our selves. But who defines these beauty standards? How can we turn the tide of such beauty pressures and encourage young girls and women everywhere to embrace a more positive body image?”


 Now those are some pretty interesting questions. Yet Unilever, the company behind Dove, shouldn’t have too much trouble finding answers to at least some of them. After all, Unilever doesn’t only offer Dove products in its Personal Care and Cosmetic portfolio.

Unilever is also the company behind brands such as Lux -  “…we all want to look and feel beautiful,”  - and Ponds  - “… helping to keep your skin looking and feeling naturally beautiful.” None of the images used by these brands shows anything but a conventional take on beauty and the standards that society has learned to accept.

It’s also only a year since Unilever sold off its fine fragrance business, which included brands such as Calvin Klein and Chloe, both of which did more than their share of bombarding consumers with airbrushed images of unattainable beauty over the years.

Now, of course we should be grateful that a company is investing significant sums of money in important social issues but at the same time, Unilever should not be treating consumers as naïve. By pleading innocence and implying that the company has had nothing to do with setting beauty ideals in the past raises questions about the sincerity of the whole campaign. And it’s not as if there’s nothing in it for the Dove brand.

Should we believe that Unilever is a “reformed” company nowadays? Well, maybe. And when we start seeing obese people in advertising for Unilever brands such as Helllmann’s and Bertolli then it will definitely be time to reconsider.

A Jaguar? How gorgeous.

7. September 2006

As a fan of old British cars, (and there are hardly any new ones left to be a fan of,) and as an ex-owner of a 1965 S-Type Jaguar, I hated the “Gorgeous” campaign when it appeared first in the UK – as did most Jag fans. Now it has been running for a while here in Germany too and I have been exposed to it more regularly …. I dislike it even more. But now I dislike it for strategic reasons as well. 

I have no real idea whether the campaign is right for my home country, (I’m sure it’s not, actually,) but it is hard to imagine anyone proposing such a campaign for the German market. It can only have been a central decision for a world-wide campaign which, regardless of what anyone living and working here said against it, has been adapted and aired.  So what’s wrong with it strategically? Let’s see, what is Jaguar’s main problem in Germany, (aside from being too close to Ford nowadays?) Well, most luxury cars are bought by companies for their male employees. Sometimes there’s a car policy, (“I’m sorry, you have to drive a Jag, it’s company policy,) but often there’s a budget to work with and the choice of car is left up to the driver. 

Choosing a BMW, a Mercedes or an Audi signalises something about the driver to the other employees – and we all have a good idea of what that is in each case. So what does choosing a Jag signalise to others? That the driver is very Individual, has good-taste, class, etc. But also that they’re flamboyant, ostentatious and probably bad with money! Driving a company Jaguar somehow makes the driver look more egoistic than driving another make of car which costs no less. 

What does a company do in such a situation? Does it try to work against the pre-conceived notions and provide some rational reasons for making such an emotional decision as choosing a Jag? No, instead it accentuates the luxurious, egoistic nature of the decision, thereby exacerbating the negative opinion that many people may have of Jaguar drivers.  Gorgeous? Well, Jaguars cars certainly are but their campaign certainly isn’t. (How many Germans can even pronounce the word properly? It’s not that geläufig.) 

Jaguar’s sales were already down to homeopathic levels before the campaign started – soon, the costs of advertising them may even outstrip net sales.